Idea Screening
Following on from the Idea Generation phase, an
organisation may be left with hundreds of successful, newly developed products
and services (Toubia and Florès, 2007). The Idea Screening Process is
therefore seen to be one of the most prominent elements to the product
development phase, playing an important role in innovation success. At this
stage, a management team evaluates new products and service ideas, developed on
from the idea generation phase, undergoing processes that involve high levels
of uncertainty and ambiguity, making a ‘first go or no go’ decision based upon
certain levels of criteria chosen by the team (Hammedi, Van Reil and Sasovova,
2011).
Limited available resources make it difficult to
develop several products at the same time, and a successful idea screening
process contributes to a more focused product development process, with a
higher possibility of success (Candice Consulting, 2013).
Examples of Idea Screening
Nike are continuously developing and re-evaluating
their products to produce high quality sports wear. Their aim in this phase is
to produce a ‘refined standard for innovation and sustainability – a standard
we use to assess our products’ (Nike Inc., 2012). In order for their
product goal to become successful, Nike have successfully ‘developed a
predictive tool to quantify, in real time, the environmental impacts of each
choice a designer makes’ (Nike Inc., 2012). Nike therefore uses Idea Screening
to eliminate unwanted products, successfully producing only environmentally
friendly and sustainable products.
Another example of this is Galvin Green, where Idea
Screening is continuously used to develop the latest waterproof clothing
specifically made for Golf, using this process to create a 'full range of
high-tech garments, designed to match and function in combination [...]
specifically developed for the game of golf. Designed by golfers, for golfers'
(Galvin Green, 2013). This allows the developed products to be innovative,
therefore showing why this company is a leading Golf manufacturer.
The Process Itself
The following Decision Making Matrix (Figure 1)
presents the evaluation of three product ideas, marked against 6 criteria. This
method uses numeric techniques to help decision makers choose among a discrete
set of alternative decisions and its success is based upon the utility of the
decision makers involved (Triantaphyllou, 2000).The Matrix can be seen as bias
as although it is carried out with a customer focus, it is the decision makers
final choice of which score each product is granted.
Figure. 1
This specific matrix presents Product 1 to be marked
relatively low in comparison to the other products due to alternatives being
available in the market and the high level of risk involved in creating the product
that could lead to low profit once developed. Product 2 and Product 3
ranked similarly against all criteria as the both presented to have a
gap in the market along with a high potential profit gain. However, the product
that will be taken forward into the next process stage is Product 3 due to the
prominent gap in the market for this design of shoe.
Word Count: 499
References
Toubia, O., & Florès, L. (2007). Adaptive idea
screening using consumers. Marketing Science, 26(3), 342-360.
Hammedi, W., Van Riel, A. C., & Sasovova, Z.
(2011). Antecedents and Consequences of Reflexivity in New Product Idea
Screening. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(5),
662-679.
Candice Consulting. 4.3 Idea Screening (2013).
Available at: http://www.slmsc-project.eu/en/?page_id=2142 [Accessed:
18/11/2013]
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision
making methods (pp. 5-21). Springer US.
Nike Inc. Designing Product: Shrinking the footprint
of our products (2012). Available at: http://nikeinc.com/pages/products.
[Accessed: 19/11/2013]
Nike Inc. Strategy: A New Model and Shift to
a Sustainable Business and Innovation (2012). Available
at: http://www.nikebiz.com/crreport/content/strategy/2-1-4-a-new-model-and-shift-to-sustainable-business-and-innovation.php?cat=cr-strategy.
[Accessed on: 19/11/2013]
Galvin Green. Multi-Layer Concept (2013). Available at:
http://www.galvingreen.com/2013/multi_layer_concept.html. [Acessed on:
19/11/2013]
+Paul Blakey
+Paul Blakey
You have used a good structure within your work and presented your material in a logical and progressive manner. Explaining the academic basis of this stage of the NPD process at the start is beneficial, and you have used appropriate sources. Your mid-section attempts to offer an applied example, although a little more precise detail around the assessment criteria is advised. The final section is very good and shows a clear appreciation of the main components being applied through your own ideas. Again a few comments about the assessment criteria would add depth to your analysis.
ReplyDeleteMark awarded: 71%
ReplyDelete